When School Safety Comes at the Cost of Privacy
How Gaggle and Similar Systems Are Changing the Boundaries of Privacy in U.S. School Districts
Join thousands who are already exploring the world of cybersecurity with Bidemi Ologunde’s IntelEdge360 on Substack. Uncover real-world cases, grasp the complexities of cyber threats, and learn from expert analyses. For less than $5 a month, you’ll get exclusive access to articles and insights that keep you informed and ahead in this ever-changing field. Plus, don’t forget to subscribe to Bidemi’s top-rated podcast, The Bid Picture.
Meanwhile, in Ohio…
In the U.S. state of Ohio, a growing debate over student privacy and safety is unfolding in three of the state’s largest school districts: Columbus, Cleveland, and Cincinnati.
At a high school in Columbus, a student received a notification on their school-issued laptop, alerting them that their device is monitored by Gaggle, a software that tracks online behavior for potentially dangerous or inappropriate content. The student learned that their Google Workspace and Microsoft Office 365 accounts are monitored around the clock, not just for schoolwork, but also for signs of cyberbullying, self-harm, or even thoughts of suicide. For some students, this oversight feels intrusive, like the school is constantly watching over their shoulders.
Across the state in Cleveland, a group of concerned parents gathered for a community meeting. They voice strong opposition to Gaggle, describing it as a serious violation of student privacy. One parent argued that “schools should focus on education, not surveillance,” and expressed concern that students will feel less safe if they believe everything they do online is being scrutinized. These parents fear that such monitoring might cross into overreach, turning schools into high-tech watchtowers rather than places of learning.
In Cincinnati, school officials defend the program passionately. Since adopting Gaggle in 2013, the district claims it has helped identify multiple students in crisis and, in some cases, even saved lives. Officials emphasized that the software doesn’t monitor personal accounts or social media but keeps a close eye on school-issued devices and platforms to catch warning signs before tragedy strikes. “The goal is prevention,” one school administrator explained, pointing to the thousands of alerts that Gaggle’s system had flagged nationwide. They see the software as an essential tool to safeguard students, particularly in an era where mental health issues and school safety are increasingly critical concerns.
The Expansion of Surveillance in U.S. Schools
Surveillance in U.S. schools has grown rapidly, with over 1,500 school districts across the U.S. using monitoring software like Gaggle. Originally launched in the 1990s, Gaggle provides digital surveillance by monitoring students’ use of platforms such as Google Workspace and Microsoft Office 365. Its primary goal is to detect early warning signs of potential crises, such as self-harm, bullying, or violent behavior. The software has become a key part of many districts’ safety protocols, as it is designed to alert school administrators to potential threats before they escalate.
In Ohio, three of the state’s largest school districts—Columbus, Cleveland, and Cincinnati—have embraced Gaggle as a preventive measure. Columbus, Ohio’s largest school district, recently signed two contracts totaling over $150,000 to implement the system across its middle and high schools. Cincinnati, the state’s second-largest school district, has used Gaggle since 2013, and spends over $323,000 annually on the service, reflecting the district’s significant investment in this technology.
This expansion highlights the increasing reliance on surveillance as districts face growing concerns about student safety, including rising mental health challenges and cyberbullying incidents. By flagging content related to dangerous behavior, Gaggle allows schools to intervene in real-time, providing an additional layer of security beyond traditional school safety measures. This trend is part of a broader national effort to use technology to ensure student safety in the digital age.
However, the rapid adoption of such tools also raises questions about student privacy and whether schools are trading too much of it for security. Critics argue that constant surveillance could erode trust between students and schools, potentially leading to a chilling effect on students’ online behavior.
Safety and Crisis Prevention
The primary justification for surveillance software in schools revolves around the protection of student safety. Proponents of Gaggle argue that its real-time monitoring of online activities helps prevent tragedies by flagging concerning behaviors or language. This is especially relevant when students express signs of self-harm, depression, or other indicators of emotional distress. According to Gaggle’s internal data, from 2018 to 2023, the company claims to have helped save over 5,790 lives through timely intervention based on its alerts.
In Columbus, Ohio, school officials view Gaggle as a critical tool for enhancing student safety. They highlight that the software operates around the clock, scanning emails, documents, and messages on platforms like Google Workspace and Microsoft Office 365. In 2021 alone, Gaggle flagged 1,275 incidents in Ohio school districts that required immediate intervention. This statistic is often cited by district administrators to justify the financial investment in the software and its widespread use in schools. By catching these red flags early, the system gives schools a chance to take action—whether that’s alerting parents, contacting emergency services, or offering mental health support to the affected student.
The idea behind Gaggle and similar systems is to protect students, not just from external threats like cyberbullying, but also from internal struggles, such as anxiety or thoughts of self-harm, that may go unnoticed by teachers or parents. The software offers educators and administrators an additional layer of oversight, reducing the risk that a student in crisis slips through the cracks.
Privacy Concerns
One of the key issues raised against student surveillance software like Gaggle is the feeling of constant monitoring, which many parents and privacy advocates argue creates a “Big Brother” atmosphere. Although Gaggle only tracks activity on school-issued platforms and devices, this type of oversight often leaves students feeling as though their every move is scrutinized, turning what should be a safe learning environment into a space of constant surveillance.
A major concern is that Gaggle’s artificial intelligence (AI) system can easily misinterpret context, flagging innocuous student communications as threats. For example, the software may identify harmless uses of slang or casual swearing as dangerous, potentially leading to unnecessary escalations. This lack of nuanced understanding has prompted fears of overreach, where students could be penalized or falsely labeled for benign behavior.
Moreover, some worry about the potential for surveillance to extend beyond school-related platforms. Critics wonder what would prevent future expansions into students’ personal emails or social media. These concerns are heightened by the fact that many students, especially those from lower-income families, have no choice but to use school-provided devices, meaning they can’t simply opt out of this system.
There is also the question of bias and the long-term impacts on students flagged by the system. Mislabeling students as high-risk based on false positives could lead to stigmatization or differential treatment from educators and mental health professionals. Some have even compared Gaggle’s surveillance approach to “predictive policing,” which is known to disproportionately affect marginalized communities.
Conclusion
When it comes to balancing student safety and privacy, school districts are faced with a complex challenge. Gaggle and similar surveillance systems are designed to protect students by flagging harmful behavior, but they also raise concerns about student privacy. These systems aim to prevent tragedies, such as self-harm or violence, by monitoring school-issued devices, but the level of oversight can feel invasive to both students and parents. For instance, while Gaggle has helped save lives by intervening in critical situations, it also monitors online activity continuously, which can create an atmosphere of constant surveillance.
The debate centers on the need to safeguard students from threats while also preserving their right to privacy. This challenge mirrors broader societal tensions between privacy and security, where measures taken to protect individuals may infringe upon personal freedoms. Schools must strike a delicate balance: providing s safe environment while respecting the autonomy and trust of students. For many districts, transparency is key—being open with families about what is monitored and why can help build trust.
Ultimately, the future of student surveillance lies in finding the right balance, where technology is used responsibly to ensure safety without overstepping boundaries. Collaboration between school administrators, parents, and students is essential to ensure that both security and privacy are adequately protected.
